Skip to content

Incomplete info — again.

While certainly finding 134-Cs is a pretty good fingerprint of where it comes from, this table does not give equally important info like: 1.) what unit volume of water examined; and 2.) dates. Further, was this the ONLY time such readings occurred? or, did more occur of time, and at what levels? The report claims these are “high levels”; but, compared to WHAT? What is the “official” standard for Japanese drinking water? International standards? It’s this kind of sloppy and incomplete reporting of the rad data that renders much of these kinds of reports relatively useless and alarmist, and easily dismissed and/or discredited. Grrr! Tighten it up, people!


Hello world!

Welcome to! This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.

Happy blogging!