Skip to content

Incomplete info — again.

September 2, 2017

While certainly finding 134-Cs is a pretty good fingerprint of where it comes from, this table does not give equally important info like: 1.) what unit volume of water examined; and 2.) dates. Further, was this the ONLY time such readings occurred? or, did more occur of time, and at what levels? The report claims these are “high levels”; but, compared to WHAT? What is the “official” standard for Japanese drinking water? International standards? It’s this kind of sloppy and incomplete reporting of the rad data that renders much of these kinds of reports relatively useless and alarmist, and easily dismissed and/or discredited. Grrr! Tighten it up, people!


From → Uncategorized

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: